What lands on your patient’s phone.

A patient leaves an appointment holding more instruction than anyone retains, and the stretch between that evening and the next appointment is where the program is either real or theoretical.

That evening they enter the one-time code you handed them and choose, scope by scope, what your clinic may see. The plan you recorded is then on their phone: the medication, the day it falls on, and your instruction sitting underneath it, attributed to your clinic, and read-only, because it is yours and not theirs to edit.

Jeni is the patient’s own weight-management app, and your plan sits inside a day it already runs. That is the whole reason this can work: nobody sustains a clinical questionnaire for a year, and everybody keeps using an app they already opened.

People who have been sold weight products before arrive with good reasons to distrust one. Most of what follows is about not spending that trust.

Consent here is not a checkbox at signup. It is a set of standing permissions the patient can inspect and withdraw, and the product is built so that they can always see what their clinic saw.

The plan belongs to the practice. It is recorded by a clinician at the practice, it reaches the patient with that attribution, and the instruction they read is one someone at your clinic wrote. A patient who has a good month attributes it to their doctor, which is correct: the pathway is theirs.

The relationship is yours; we only run it. That distinction is worth being pedantic about, because every company that has quietly crossed it ended up competing with the practices it sold to.